By Jean Pierre Romain
This is an inquiry for evolutionists. I have listened to hundreds of hours of creation vs evolution debates. Furthermore listening to the major evolutionists of all a really long time since Darwin, by the by i have not caught a description on how this naturalistic framework might be an actuality outside of the textbooks.
Creation and if we ask the question What is creationism. May people would say creationism is not science. Thus making human authority the end sentence in truth. But can man decide what is truth? Wouldn't you need to have all knowledge in the universe to decide that God does not exist?
How can you judge something knowing only one side of the story? It is like a judge knowing only one side of the story in a case and deciding only his limited knowledge and his half truth! Nevertheless if we take the theory of evolution the evolutionists say that all things would have come through natural selection and mutations which is completely different from creationism and the creation.
Seeing the evolutionists view, they state that the lot has delivered as promised natural selection and changes which are completely notable from the creationism view and the creation. The request we can ask is. What is natural selection? In the statement: natural selection. What does the expression 'natural selection' mean? The sentence 'natural selection' does not mean anything. All believers acknowledge that natural selection was made by God. In the meantime if evolutionists state that this natural selection can change something into something else it might need to be proven. This is not so yet creationism has a more straightforward reaction: God made natural selection which can bring about minor changes in the specie.
All believers realize that natural selection was made by God. At the same time if evolutionists state that this natural selection has the ability to change something into something else it would need to be proven. This is not in this way, yet creationism has a more straightforward response: God made natural selection which can think and give minor changes. However the sole deductive evidence we have of natural selection making the whole lot in the universe is the opinion of certain scientists. So now science requiring verification has been altered into 'We just require a researcher to give us his opinion' This is not science yet creationism is and the creation vs evolution issue is taking a turn.
How did natural selection get here? How does natural selection know what to select? Why does natural selection selects the most fit? Who chooses it to be so? Why not select the least fit into becoming more fit and survive? How did natural selection receive the intelligence to select? How did natural selection have the energy necessary to select billions of human being, animals and plants? No one knows, then this theory should not be considered science! And people should examine more clearly creationism and the creation vs evolution issue
About the Author:
What is the meaning of the sentence 'Natural selection'? No one can give a plausible explanation on this creation vs evolution (http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php) issue. How did this natural selection come about? Is it creation or evolutoin (http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-dinosaurs.php) ?
This is an inquiry for evolutionists. I have listened to hundreds of hours of creation vs evolution debates. Furthermore listening to the major evolutionists of all a really long time since Darwin, by the by i have not caught a description on how this naturalistic framework might be an actuality outside of the textbooks.
Creation and if we ask the question What is creationism. May people would say creationism is not science. Thus making human authority the end sentence in truth. But can man decide what is truth? Wouldn't you need to have all knowledge in the universe to decide that God does not exist?
How can you judge something knowing only one side of the story? It is like a judge knowing only one side of the story in a case and deciding only his limited knowledge and his half truth! Nevertheless if we take the theory of evolution the evolutionists say that all things would have come through natural selection and mutations which is completely different from creationism and the creation.
Seeing the evolutionists view, they state that the lot has delivered as promised natural selection and changes which are completely notable from the creationism view and the creation. The request we can ask is. What is natural selection? In the statement: natural selection. What does the expression 'natural selection' mean? The sentence 'natural selection' does not mean anything. All believers acknowledge that natural selection was made by God. In the meantime if evolutionists state that this natural selection can change something into something else it might need to be proven. This is not so yet creationism has a more straightforward reaction: God made natural selection which can bring about minor changes in the specie.
All believers realize that natural selection was made by God. At the same time if evolutionists state that this natural selection has the ability to change something into something else it would need to be proven. This is not in this way, yet creationism has a more straightforward response: God made natural selection which can think and give minor changes. However the sole deductive evidence we have of natural selection making the whole lot in the universe is the opinion of certain scientists. So now science requiring verification has been altered into 'We just require a researcher to give us his opinion' This is not science yet creationism is and the creation vs evolution issue is taking a turn.
How did natural selection get here? How does natural selection know what to select? Why does natural selection selects the most fit? Who chooses it to be so? Why not select the least fit into becoming more fit and survive? How did natural selection receive the intelligence to select? How did natural selection have the energy necessary to select billions of human being, animals and plants? No one knows, then this theory should not be considered science! And people should examine more clearly creationism and the creation vs evolution issue
About the Author:
What is the meaning of the sentence 'Natural selection'? No one can give a plausible explanation on this creation vs evolution (http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php) issue. How did this natural selection come about? Is it creation or evolutoin (http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-dinosaurs.php) ?